How to Disagree About Argument Schemes
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Argument Schemes for Reasoning about Trust
Trust is a natural mechanism by which an autonomous party can deal with the inherent uncertainty regarding the behaviors of other parties and the uncertainty in the information it shares with those parties. Trust is thus crucial in any decentralized system. We build on recent efforts to use argumentation to reason about trust. Specifically, we provide a set of schemes, abstract patterns of reas...
متن کاملDisagreeing About What We Disagree About
Two studies examined misperceptions of disagreement in partisan social conflicts, namely, in the debates over abortion (Study 1) and politics (Study 2). We observed that partisans tend to exaggerate differences of opinion with their adversaries. Further, we found that perceptions of disagreement were more pronounced for values that were central to the perceiver’s own ideology than for values th...
متن کاملArgument Schemes for Reasoning About the Actions of Others
In practical reasoning, it is important to take into consideration what other agents will do, since this will often influence the effect of actions performed by the agent concerned. In previous treatments, the actions of others must either be assumed, or argued for using a similar form of practical reasoning. Such arguments, however, will also depend on assumptions about the beliefs, values and...
متن کاملA Dialogue Game to Agree to Disagree about Inconsistent Information
This paper proposes a dialogue game in which coherent conversational sequences at the speech act level are described of agents that become aware they have a disagreement and settle the dispute by agreeing to disagree when they believe insufficient propositions to resolve the situation. A dialogue game is formulated in which agents can offer information possibly resulting in non-reconcilable, mu...
متن کاملHow Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?
We follow a new approach for the implementation of cooperative bargaining solutions in a non-cooperative framework. We model what happens in case of disagreement in order to give players the incentive to reach an agreement which coincides with a cooperative solution. Our model consist of two phases. Many of the standard bargaining procedures can constitute the first phase. The second mechanism ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Informal Logic
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0824-2577,0824-2577
DOI: 10.22329/il.v36i4.4610